Do you agree with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that it...

And Ukraine then can decide at any time — when they are ready — to pursue that.

There is also a Ukrane-Russia border treaty of 2003, signed by Vladimir Putin himself.

If Ukraine shouldn’t strive to reclaim its 1991 internationally recognized borders, then probably it should strive for its 1918 borders, which were even larger, including several regions that are now part of Russia.

Why are there no fossils for the 'missing link' that connects our ancestors with other species? Is this a misconception or is there another explanation?

Like, if the borders are fluid and any country can just disregard the international laws and simply grab what they can, then why shouldn’t Ukraine strive for that?

There are internationally recognised borders of Ukraine, since 1991.

Putin signed the border treaty in January 2003 (and ratified it in April 2004), which Russia is now in breach, after announcing 5 regions of Ukraine “annexed”.

How should one handle an uninvited guest at a small, intimate wedding ceremony? Is it appropriate to ask them not to attend?

And force genocidal invaders like Russia respect the international laws.

Or: we should all decide to live in the world order where the borders are set.

First, there is no need to talk about “pre-2014 borders.”

Civilization VII patch lets you turn off some controversial new features - Ars Technica

At the Munich Security Conference, the U.S. chief of defence Hegseth announced that Ukraine's return to pre-2014 borders would be “unrealistic” and would only “prolong war.”

There were 1994 U.S. assurances to defend Ukrainian territorial integrity, in exchange to Ukraine giving up its world’s 3rd largest nuclear arsenal.

Do you agree with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that it is unrealistic to expect Ukraine to return to its pre-2014 borders?

Read also: